Google faces backlash for plan that would turn off Search for schools that restrict AI
Politicians on the left, like NYC mayor Zohran Mamdani and former FTC chair Lina Khan, accused Google of acting as an unregulated monopoly.
Google was met with swift backlash on Tuesday after it announced that schools using Googleβs K-12 software will not be able to use Search unless they opt in to using AI tools.
Chris Phillips, vice president for education at Google, told The New York Times that βSearch and AI are deeply integrated,β so if a studentβs school doesnβt opt in to using AI tools like Gemini, then students βwill not have access to search, and theyβll see a message from their school that indicates itβs not available.β
Even as Google made this announcement on a busy Election Day, several left-leaning politicians took time to speak up about their concerns.
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) accused Google in an X post of βextortion,β writing that βGoogle is threatening schools: if you stop your students from using AI, we will cut off your access to Google Search.β Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) said on X that Google is βmore concerned with forcing Gemini into schools than enabling students to succeed.β
President Trump claimed that AI oligarchs could regulate themselves because they βlove our country.β
β Sen. Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) November 3, 2026
Now, Google is threatening schools: if you stop your students from using AI, we will cut off your access to Google Search.
Thatβs not love. Thatβs extortion.
PAUSE AI NOW.
Lina Khan, the former FTC chair and staunch advocate against monopolies, also condemned Googleβs decision as anti-competitive.
βThis highlights the danger of allowing an unregulated monopolist to control an essential service,β she wrote. βMultiple courts have found Google liable for violating antitrust laws, and this latest move shows it remains unchastened.β
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani accused Google of being a monopoly, commenting, βNo corporation should have the power to dictate how we teach our children.β
Google is using its search monopoly to coerce schools into adopting AI. This highlights the danger of allowing an unregulated monopolist to control an essential service.
β Lina Khan (@linamkhan) November 3, 2026
Multiple courts have found Google liable for violating antitrust laws, and this latest move shows it remains⦠https://t.co/eajJN9yfQF
While Search is a necessary tool for information gathering, educators worry that its built-in AI overviews could dissuade students from finding answers themselves. For millions of students required to use Chromebooks and Google education tools, using a different search engine isnβt a simple fix.
Google says that itβs working on a βGuided Learningβ tool for student accounts in Search, which is supposed to walk students through the process of solving a problem or finding information, rather than just handing them the answer. If a student is struggling with a math problem, for example, the feature may prompt them to refresh their memory about the rules for dividing exponents, instead of spitting out a number.
In response to the backlash, Google pointed out in a post on X that it had listened to educators by turning off access to AI products by default, and noted that schools could turn on Gemini, Gemini Notebook, and Search individually.
We want to clarify what we announced today about our education services. Todayβs announcements give schools more choice, not less. Hereβs what we announced:
β News from Google (@NewsFromGoogle) November 3, 2026
β Gemini, Gemini Notebook, and Search will be OFF π΄ by default. This is based on K-12 schools asking for more controlβ¦
βWe know thereβs concern about students using AI to shortcut schoolwork, and schools have told us they want control,β Google wrote in a statement. βThatβs exactly why we are making these changes today to address the feedback weβve heard from educators in recent months. And weβll continue to engage deeply with educators to ensure we are giving schools more choice, more controls, and improved Search for learning.β
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesnβt affect our editorial independence.
Amanda Silberling is a senior writer at TechCrunch covering the intersection of technology and culture. She has also written for publications like Polygon, MTV, the Kenyon Review, NPR, and Business Insider. She is the co-host of Wow If True, a podcast about internet culture, with science fiction author Isabel J. Kim. Prior to joining TechCrunch, she worked as a grassroots organizer, museum educator, and film festival coordinator. She holds a B.A. in English from the University of Pennsylvania and served as a Princeton in Asia Fellow in Laos.
You can contact or verify outreach from Amanda by emailing [emailΒ protected]Β or via encrypted message at @amanda.100 on Signal.
Originally published by TechCrunch AI. Aggregated on AIWithGhost for educational purposes β full credit and traffic to the original publisher.