AI Model Routing: Why Using One Model for Everything Is a Mistake
AI Model Routing: Why Using One Model for Everything Is a Mistake Most teams pick one model and send every request through it — classification, extraction, and complex reasoning all hitting the same expensive endpoint.
AI Model Routing: Why Using One Model for Everything Is a Mistake
Most teams pick one model and send every request through it — classification, extraction, and complex reasoning all hitting the same expensive endpoint. That's leaving real money on the table, and it's an easy fix.
💸 Where the Waste Actually Is
Tagging a support ticket, extracting a date from an email, or classifying intent doesn't need a frontier model — it needs a fast, cheap one that gets it right 95%+ of the time. Running that through your most expensive model is pure margin loss at volume.
🔀 A Simple Routing Pattern
Route by task shape, not by vibes: structured extraction and classification go to the cheap tier by default. Anything requiring multi-step reasoning, nuance, or a decision with real consequences goes to the capable tier. Add a confidence-based escalation for the cheap tier's uncertain cases.
🚧 When Routing Isn't Worth the Complexity
If your volume is low enough that the cost difference is a rounding error, don't build routing logic you now have to maintain. This is a volume optimization, not a default architecture pattern — only add it once cost actually shows up on a bill that matters.
Originally published on the KLYX blog.
Originally published by Dev.to AI. Aggregated on AIWithGhost for educational purposes — full credit and traffic to the original publisher.